Daryl Bradford Smith: Unclear on Everything

According to Daryl Bradford Smith [DBS], John Kaminski dated the Jewess Judy Andreas, which I really do not know or care whether or not it's accurate. It doesn't matter.

Even if Kaminski himself were Jewish or part Jewish, which is what I supposed looking at his last name, he doesn't think and act like a Jew. One can almost say the same thing about Finkelstein. Furthermore, I myself have partial Jewish ethnicity through my matrilineal great grandmother; now, are people really going to suppose that I am a Jew or a Zionist agent simply because of that? That's ridiculous. The Nazis didn't even consider people with anything less than 25% Jewish blood Jewish. What will DBS have to say when he finds out that Milch, Wilberg, Ascher, Litzmann, and numerous other high-ranking Nazis were Jewish or part Jewish? Were they "Zionist agents" too? Come on!

Moving along…

DBS claims that Rense, Kaminski, Irving and numerous others are all "Zionist agents" because, I guess, they are lenient with Jews in some cases? I don't really know what his deal is because he's always unclear. One minute he condemns anyone who might be Jewish, might have dated a Jew, or might be working with a Jew; yet, at the same time, DBS gives Jews in Israel the pass when it comes to accountability for Zionism. Moreover, he makes non-Jews more accountable for Jewish behavior than Jews themselves in many cases, i.e., "white supremacists and neo-Nazis."

Lastly, he's the one who won't touch the alleged holocaust with a ten foot pole...usually, those who won't touch the alleged holocaust are part of the problem, not part of the solution. DBS is so quick to slam David Irving, also alleged to be half-Jewish, for being a "useful idiot"; yet, without Irving's scholarship and research--even though it may not be respected by Jews, so-called "holocaust experts" like Lipstadt, and mainstream historians--very little would be known about Hitler himself without it.

It is obvious that DBS is a blow hard of the highest order. He uses many tools and many different revisionist theories to make his case, but, without other peoples' efforts, he wouldn't have squat. That tells me that he may well be Jewish himself--either that, or a Zionist tool to combat Internet revolutionaries like Rense and Kaminski whom the Jews now fear. They are being exposed at every possible level by many different people from many different perspectives. That's a problem for them and they will use whatever methods they must to undermine those peoples' research and findings.

Remember this: Jews and their agents always attack personally. It is a trademark of theirs. It is also very hurtful. I don't care how tough these people act like they are, it is not fun being personally defamed and slandered by another person. I can say that from first-hand experience. I was so angry about that slander blog posted by Davide Semenetti in my name that I couldn't sleep for about two weeks. I would wake up in the middle of the night worrying about whether or not that might cost me my job or college enrollment. One must understand that a person trying to live, go to school, or work in the US cannot have their name affiliated with Adolf Hitler. That's how it works in our ZOG. That is how it works in America. Only certain ideas are okay to have. That being said...the Jews and their Shabbat Goy know that we are right and they know they are guilty; hence, they rely upon slander, libel, and defamation of character. Do not ever let them guide your opinions of others. Never. That's what Smith is doing. He is defaming people in order to get us to criticize them and ourselves, for either reading what they have to say, or for actually following them. That's a Jewish tactic. I almost fell for DBS's swindle too. I am not too proud to admit that. Thank God he made the mistake of slandering Hitler and I read it, because had he not done that, I might still be promoting that man's disinformation.

I might like to add that DBS does have a point about Maynard, because he appears to be nothing more than a whiner and a true racist. He adheres to age-old stereotypes regarding just about every subject so, DBS does have his place even though he’s garbage himself. Anyone who rails against Hitler without any knowledge of him needs to just shut the hell up about it. Such is the case with DBS. But, perhaps Smith is right about whining whites like Maynard. I have had to completely disassociate from Maynard due to his scathing racial remarks and his rudeness on a personal level. I have never met a more unkind and ungenerous creep. No scholar should be asked to tolerate such vindictiveness. Anyone that harbors that much hatred needs to be ignored.

A little lesson from history too, while I'm at it: The only negative thing the Jews could say about Hitler was that he was a house painter and a corporal. Once again, they couldn't attack his position or credibility, so they resorted to the defamation of his person. They always have to make it personal. One must really be strong-willed and tough to take on Jewry.

Back Next Back to top