Who Was Responsible for WWII?

AHRS

 

America Entered the War Well Before Hitler Made His Official Declaration of War

As documented by Walendy (1981), “In summer 1939, F.D. Rosenfeld [Dutch Jew] urged Chamberlain and Daladier to make promises to Poland, regardless whether they could be kept or not of which the repeated words to Kennedy in London found the classical expression of he has ‘to put some iron up Chamberlain’s backside’. At the same time, Rosenfeld did everything to talk the Congress into changing the neutrality law” (p. 393).

So, this notion of Rosenfeld’s innocence is just that, a notion. To act as though Hitler was the only one “itching for war,” while the Dutch Jew was making statements such as these, would be folly. In fact, on 28 May 1939, Rosenfeld had already committed America to the war, which is obvious in his dialogue with the “Czech ex-President E. Bensch [while] in Hyde-Park, north of New York” (Walendy, p. 393).

Rosenfeld said, “I think the [US] will also have to enter the war in any case. Europe alone cannot win the war against Hitler. And even if the United States does not enter the fight against Nazism, Nazism will attack the United States. …” (p. 393).

First of all, how can Rosenfeld have the audacity to think that he alone can determine what is or is not good for Europe? It seems that he has decided the case for Europe, which in his mind is against “Nazism” when he isn’t even a European. This sounds like Bush today. Bush thinks that he has the right, no less the ability, to determine the destinies of the various nation-states in the present-day Mid-East. It seems that these two American presidents thought along similar lines and both had bloated egos. No leader lacking in egotistical audacity feels that he or she has the right to interfere in the spheres of influence of other leaders. Is it not Bush who is imposing upon Iran’s geo-political sphere of influence and not vice versa? Was it not both Rosenfeld and Churchill who had imposed upon Germany’s geo-political sphere of influence in 1939? Stalin was the only leader who had any right whatever to declare war on Germany.

 

Also, aren't the Neo-cons the assholes saying that if we don't fight the so-called "terrorists" in Iraq that we will be fighting them here? That's the same tag line as that utilized by Rosy. If we don't fight Nazis in Europe, then we'll fight Nazis here. Oh shat ap!

 

Anyway, Stalin was the only one.

Hitler had even been so kind as to offer up the services of the German Reichswehr for the continued defense of the British Empire well into the future. This has even been documented by the Hitler-hater, Captain Liddell-Hart. Churchill rebuffed Hitler’s peace gesture and, well, you know the rest of the story.

 

Need I even mention that Schaerffenberg (2003) has succinctly and accurately documented the fact that Rosenfeld had been “vigorously promoting,” as early as 1937, the Ludlow Resolution? In the words of Schaerff, “It called for reorganizing the federal judiciary to establish a ‘national referendum on a declaration of war’ against [Hitler’s] Germany; this meant that the exclusive, Constitutional right to declare war would be taken from Congress [where we are today with G.W. Lenin and his Jewish war-hawks, better known as the “Neocons”] and placed at the disposal of newspaper opinion polls” (p. 105). Now, let us recall that the majority of the top newspapers at the time were owned, influenced, or controlled by Jews; most notable among the hordes of worthless propaganda stood the Jew York Times. Don’t believe me? Check out historian Don Heddesheimer’s The First Holocaust. “If sufficient public hysteria could be whipped up by journalistic demagogues, the American people could be dragged into war by special interest groups [think Jewish AIPAC right about now] with personal agendas all their own. In effect, the Ludlow Resolution would have given the President power to declare war on whomever he pleased [sorta like GDub].

 

Congress overwhelmingly voted down this flagrantly un-Constitutional scheme, but [Rosenfeld’s] intentions were clear. During a public speech in Chicago on October 5 of the same year, he called for ‘a quarantine’ to isolate Germany from the rest of the world and commercially strangle her people” (Ibid.). This is exactly what Herbert Walker Lenin had done to the Iraqis under Saddam some years ago; and, it is exactly what the son is doing to the Iranians today.

 

Ever heard of the “White Paper”? Schickelgruber—our most courageous Christian warrior-babe, God bless his soul—had obtained, to the great dismay of Jewmerica and Rosy, the “diplomatic correspondence” between Rosy and William Bullitt. These docs were crucial in the Natso indictment of Rosy as the instigator of WWII, as he had unwittingly painted himself the peace-loving Jew, but had actually hoodwinked the Poles into war against Adi. Too bad Adi got those papers, eh? Adi had the transcripts published in numerous languages, for the world to read, English inclusive. Even Jewmericans could read what Rosy had desired, which was far short of “peace.” You know, the truth, unlike what the mainstream historians want us to know?

 

Adi said, during his Reichstag speech on 11 December 1941, “These papers…were sent by the former Polish ambassador in Washington, Count (Jerzy) Potoki, to his government in Warsaw. These documents clearly and shockingly reveal the extent to which one man and the powers behind him [read: Jews] are responsible for the Second World War” (Schaerff, p. 106). This sounds too much like GDub and his Neocon Jews and how they are the only ones responsible for the Iraq Bolshevizing Campaign. Sure the Jewmerican people who continue to support him are also responsible, and ought to be hanged for so doing, but, the ones who are really trying to expose the lies and deceit of this illegal bloodbath against Islam and the Middle Eastern will to culture—in midst of Jewry’s world takeover through its two proxies, Not-So-Great Jewtain and Jewmerica—must be exonerated.

 

A few more things.

 

Soon after the war began, it was Rosy, not Adi, who had “violated US neutrality by dispatching aid to the Allies. Even before the fall of France, a US freighter with arms for Jewtain sailed on June 13, 1940. In a telegram two days later to the French Premiere, Paul Reynaud, Rosenfeld offered to double American aid if France continued its war against Germany” (Schaerff, pp. 105-106). That following September, even though America was still a neutral nation-state—its peoples still believing that their Jewish leadership was abiding by such a non-interventionist foreign policy—Rosy “sent fifty destroyers to the Royal Navy, making a mockery of official American policy.” Rosy sent 20 PT boats as a supplement to those destroyers (Ibid., p. 106). Ain’t it a b*tch though, that British military vessels were constantly being repaired in American shipyards? That was a staunch violation of the very international law that America claimed it was still abiding by! Kewt.

 

On top of all that, one year before the retaliatory attack on PH, Rosy had ordered that American military planners meet with British planners to orchestrate their collective destruction of Germany. Idn’t that just as cute as the Rense kitty? What a peace-lover, that Rosy! Anyway, the two “democracies” drafted the plans to annihilate Germany way before Hitler had even dreamed of officially declaring war on Jewmerica.

 

Need I mention that if Adi had wanted to break England he could have done so during Dunkirk and, during his half-assed blitz over London? He didn't want to engage the British. He wanted peace. That’s why our little Arian hero allowed some 350,000 Brits to flee like pussies at Dunkirk. He never even tried to blast London. That’s all been documented most thoroughly by Captain Liddell-Hart, a Hitler-hater, in his tour de force, The German Generals Talk. I own a copy.

 

Needless to say, by April 11, 1941, Americans had illegally “extended the so-called ‘Pan-American Security Zone’ to overlap the U-boats operational areas.” In layman’s terms, we invaded sovereign German waters without ever having issued an official declaration of war, which is where we are today. Rosy had also been so “peace-loving” as to force confrontation between the German u-boats and US warships, and, to top that off, the Dutch Jew went so far as to invade Greenland, establishing US “anti-shipping bases” there “without the consent of Danish authorities.” Some three months later, America’s “wonderful boys” invaded Iceland; they did so under the pretext of “relieving a British garrison” (Ibid.). Remember now, one cannot “relieve” anything without officially declaring war, otherwise it’s called “war criminal.” Indeed, Americans were “in the European war zone” (Ibid.). Hitler still waited to declare official war. He did his best not to incite or engage, but Rosy would have none of it. He wanted to crush any opposition to the Jewish nightmare known as the NWO.

 

You know, even when Rosy seized all Italian and German assets in the US, without any provocation from the Axis powers whatever, Adi still didn't react (p. 107). A true gentleman and hero. God bless him! He waited as long as he could. Adi had even commented that he would allow Churchill, Rosy, and Stalin to live out their entire lives “if [he] won the war” (Ibid, pp. 167-168). That is a far cry from what the wonderful “democracies” and Jews did to Mussolini and his mistress, and, to the Nazi leadership at the Nuremberg Mass Murder Show Trial before the AntiChrist ‘Jewish Sanhedrin of the 20th century’. The “Christians” just sat by and watched.

Current politicians, news reporters, bloggers, political analysts, and the like, have mostly praised and commended Ahmad for his fair treatment of the Britons and their prompt release from Iranian capture. Gilad Atzmon, a Jew, has even gone so far as to call Ahmad the Christian, though not in that exact term. He said that Ahmad, not Blair, is the one who understands forgiveness and wants to attain an understanding between East and West. So, why are these same people hostile to Hitler’s peace gestures towards Great Britain and Poland, when it is documented fact that Germans were suffering from tortures, rapes and mass murders at the hands of my Polish forebears? The situation in the Sudentenland was similar. The Germans were heavily discriminated against. There were even elections held before Hitler re-established the territorial boundaries of the Second Reich, Austria inclusive. It wasn’t annexed; well over 90% of the people voted in the affirmative for reincorporation into the German Reich. The Jews in Palestine don’t even allow the Palestinian-Semites to vote for a piece of shit on their plate, let alone reincorporation into the walled off region of their own Fatherland. So, to compare Dolf with Kikery isn’t quite making the cut. He was more like Ahmad. In fact, Hitler had even offered Poland absolute sovereignty within the Reich; he told them that he would go around them. They would have greatly benefited in the long run, because Germany would have defended them against the Judeo-Bolshies from Russia. Read the actual “demands” of the Poles. They’re quite lenient, nay, they’re generous! Even Keitel was a little taken aback at Hitler’s generosity in this regard. Hitler was in fact worried that he wasn’t being generous enough, so, while he was waiting for the Polish PMs reply to his peace offer he reworked it to make it even more generous.

Ahmad also allows some 25, 000 Jews to reside in Iran while all of this saber-rattling goes on and on. Hitler never would have taken harsh measures against the Jews if they had not collectively declared war upon his nation and his people. You can call it boycott, you can call it whatever the f*ck you want, but an economic action of one people against another is a provocation to war. Does the phrase “economic sanctions” ring a bell? Sounds like Bush is a lot like the Jews of ’33.

Germans were just getting back on their feet and off the street and the Jews go and declare war on them. Had Hitler just sat their and appeased the poor Jews, well, he probably would have gone down as the worst piece of shit leader in history next to GW Lenin.

Now, back to Rosenfeld, before I forget…notice how Rosy has stated that the US will enter the war “in any case”? Oh no, he just wanted peace all right. That innocent little peace-loving Jew never would have dreamed of provoking Adi. By the way, Shaerffenberg has compellingly argued--with plenty of hard evidence--that Rosy was sending US freighters and destroyers into European waters as early as 1939. Can you say “provocation to war”? If Iran sent destroyers and freighters into our waters, might we not be a bit edgy? Yeah, uh huh, that’s what I thought.

Adi didn’t declare war on the Dutch Jew until 1941. It’s amazing he waited that long. The only reason he did so was because he had to fulfill his Axis-alliance obligation with Japan, as Japan had attacked PH. Hitler had actually thought that that was not a good move. He lamented, “I hope the Japanese are fit to carry that out” [not verbatim]. He actually never wanted to make war on either Britain or America; it was Britain and America who made war on Hitler.

So, what should have been a skirmish, with few lives lost, between Germany and Russia, with a light bitch-slap to the Poles in between, became one of the bloodiest wars in history. Of course the “victorious allies” blamed it on Hitler. Did you really think they were going to say, “Yeah, we did it. We killed all those people. We were the assholes of the 20th. We made Poland all these promises and then let ‘em drown in their own blood when the Hitlerian hammer-blow fell.” If the Poles had just listened to Adi, instead of the Dutch Jew, WWII would have been just another European territorial dispute. The Jewish Bolsheviks and Stalin wanted to come West, Hitler said no; hence, WWII.

As skanky as Rosy was it was still Churchill, by and far, who was the real f*cktard of the Second World War. He played all sides and made a game of it. In fact, wasn’t he the bastard son of a Jew who had donned it the “splendid little war”?

Yes, he was the “bastard son of a Jew.” His mommy was the Jewish whore, Jenny Jacobson. She tried to pass herself off as an Iroquois Indian. Pffffft! She even had to pay Sir Churchill to marry her.

 

References

 

Schaerffenberg, A.V. (2003). Hitler: Bungling Amateur or Military Genius? USA: Preuss.

 

Walendy, U. (1981). Truth for Germany. Torrance: Institute for Historical Review.

 

 

Back   Next   Back to top