|
The statement below is pure fraud. There were no “pits.” |
|
“I emailed Story about his Eichmann claim. He referred me to Jewish historian David Cesarani's Eichmann: His Life and Crimes. The book states that as a child Eichmann was persecuted because he looked Jewish. Eichmann's stepmother had Jewish relations and he associated with Jews. Later, as a Gestapo officer, Eichmann learned Hebrew, visited Palestine and worked closely with Zionists preparing Jews for emigration” (Makow, 2007). Take a look at Eichmann’s profile. He was at least half-Jewish (possibly full). Yes, this does indeed throw a major wrench into the fable of burning babies doesn't it? |
|
So, here we have drawings, fraudulent photos, false witnesses, coerced confessions, unproven and undocumented atrocities, Jewish Nazis, outright liars, and as many as 10,000 “gassings” per day? This is ridiculous and what makes it all especially ludicrous is the extreme combing and fabricating these “editors” have done to make this book even somewhat credible. The diesel gas van story is an outright hoax. A human being can breathe diesel exhaust for a long time. Gasoline exhaust or any other method would most certainly have been utilized. The theory that “Just because diesel exhaust wasn’t the best method for killing doesn't mean it wasn’t used” is moot. Several gas van “drivers” were able to prove that they were not even in Germany at the time of these so-called mobile gassings. In fact, it would have been cheaper and more efficient to have simply suffocated the victims in an airtight room. Introducing diesel exhaust into an airtight room would have provided the intended victims with enough oxygen to mostly survive. Not one of these alleged gas vans existed/exists to prove the guilt. Please visit NaziGassings.com for an entire case file on the mobile gassing hoax.
This book relies almost entirely on fake “photos”, and the postwar Nuremberg docs and/or postwar Soviet or other Allied docs. These sources do not suffice in the event of something as supposedly “well-documented” and “beyond doubt” as the alleged “Shoah”. If the “Shoah” had occurred there would be no need at all to present any of this information because it would be as indisputable as the Amerindian genocide or the Palestinian genocide, both if which can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We are actually witnessing the Palestinian genocide on television and in the papers. The Jews simply claim that they are “accidentally” mass murdering Arabs by bombing their towns and cities. Sure.
If Hitler and the Germans were mass murderers and deserved to be historically indicted then this fraudulent “evidence” would not have needed to be published. The Jews should not need to produce but one book about the so-called “Shoah” if it had really occurred as documented and reported in the mainstream history tracts. They would not need a book called The Good Old Days: The Holocaust as Seen by Perpetrators and Bystanders. It simply would not be necessary just as a similar book on the Amerindian genocide from the perspective of bystanders is not necessary. Government docs and death records are sufficient enough. In fact, just one book, written by a Jewess nonetheless, has proven the Judeo-Soviet genocide of Russians beyond a reasonable doubt. |