|
According to this book “The extremely widespread conviction that the Germans related to other peoples uniformly [usually read: Untermensch, or “subhuman”], is undeniably incorrect. In reality, relations differed greatly. With this premise, we may begin to reach a better understanding.” Chief among the wide range of reasons was the struggle against “Bolshevism” and violent Russification. The majority of these volunteers from diverse national legions serving in the German Armed Forces were thus hailed as heroes...who during the Second World War years served in the ranks of the Wehrmacht (Army), Polizei (Police), and Waffen-SS (Armed-SS)” (p. 13).
|
|
This well-written account of Hitler’s ethnically and religiously diverse military volunteers is remarkable and amazing. Not only were Arabs, Lebanese, and Kalmycks recruited as voluntary forces, but so too were Indians, Vietnamese, Buddhists of many ethnicities, and Eastern European Slavs. This one book lays the superman nonsense to rest in a subtle and convincing manner. Not even Heinrich Himmler had held fast to the superman ravings of Friedrich Nietzsche and this fully documented account, with its numerous photographs, makes this quite obvious. This book is a must read for anyone who still believes that the Nazis were staunch racists or ethnicists.
|
|
Excerpts: “The answer is that Hitler’s intervention saved them—when nothing else could have. A sudden order from him over the telephone stopped the armoured forces just as they were in sight of Dunkirk, and held them back until the retreating British had reached the port and slipped out of their clutches” (p. 106). ...At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the “Battle over Britain” had saved her. That is only part of the explanation. The last part of it. The original cause, which goes deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, did nothing to spur them on, and cancelled them at the first plausible excuse” (106-07). ...After the conquest of Poland, and the division of the spoils with Russia, Hitler made a bid for peace with the Western Powers. When he was rebuffed he began to feel afraid of what he had started—and of his temporary partner. He expressed the view that a long-drawn-out war of attrition with Britain and France would gradually exhaust Germany’s limited resources, and expose her to a fatal attack from behind by Russia. ‘By no treaty or pact can Russia’s lasting neutrality be assured,’ he told his generals. His fear urged him to force peace on France by an offensive in the West. He hoped that if the French were defeated, the British would see reason and come to terms” (p. 107-08). |
|
According to Ernst Helmreich’s account, during Hitler’s first radio address after coming into power in 1933, he had stated the following: “The national government… will defend and maintain the foundations on which the power of our nation rests. It will offer strong protection to Christianity as the basis of our collective morality” (p. 128). Indeed, even in the private recollections of anti-Christian Martin Bormann, Hitler had indicated that a Christian-secular education was preferable to a purely secular education. He had also indicated that the teachings of Christ served as the very centrum of Nazi-German ideology. This book also confirms Hitler’s pro-church law that “a desecration or defamation of religious institutions was threatened with civil punishment; at the end of the month steps were taken in Prussia to abolish the 295 secular schools in which religion was not taught, and religion was again made a regular subject of instruction at vocational and continuation schools” (p. 129)…The religious formula was again made part of the oath, and the phrase Gott mit Uns was restored to the official seal of Prussia. |
|
This book contains portions of Otto Wagener’s memoirs between the late 1920s and early 1930s, while he was Hitler’s Economic Minister. This book causes a lot of problems for historians, especially those of Jewish descent, because it contains the private thoughts of Hitler on subjects like Christianity, Jesus Christ, race, Jewry, and even numerous scientific theories. Hitler even discusses the work of Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud in a rather congenial and non-hostile manner, which contradicts the typical Jewish accounts of Hitler’s feelings towards Jewish thinkers. These memoirs are probably the most valuable of all because they were written privately by a member of Hitler’s earliest inner circle. Oftentimes, Wagener would record what was said only after he had retired to his apartment or quarters for the evening. Furthermore, Wagener and Hitler had a parting of ways so Wagener had no reason to whitewash his portrayal of the man.
|
|
This book is filled with numerous pictures of Hitler out and about amongst the German populace and on the fields of battle during the earliest stages of the war. Far from being afraid of his people, unlike Josef Stalin who was paranoid to the point of insanity of his own confidants, Hitler needed minimal security even amongst his armed generals. According to Historian Mark Weber, Hitler did not even require that his generals visit him unarmed until after the assassination attempt that nearly killed him and blew out his eardrums. The same is the case with gun control in Germany at the time. Hitler tightened gun laws only after the Jewish black operation best referred to as Reichskristallnacht. He had to tighten gun laws as they pertained to Jewry because Jewry was the cause of the Reichstag fire and the horrible and murderous events of Kristallnacht. Out of Print. Photos... The Reichstag Fire by P. Wainwright |
|
Jochen von Lang has argued that Hitler was not aware of all the goings-on in the entire Reich as most might think (pp. 205, 239, 299, 304). For example, Martin Bormann had attempted to send a letter to Hitler’s Jewish cook, informing her that she was dismissed from her duties. Hitler rescinded her dismissal (p. 196)...Moreover, according to von Lang, Himmler had drafted a report on “The Final Solution for the Jewish Question in Europe,” in April 1943, whereupon Bormann demanded that Himmler remove the phrase “special treatment,” and the term “liquidation,” before he presented it to Hitler (p. 198). The creation Werewolf, a secret partisan organization, can be attributed solely to Martin Bormann, and it was “a total failure” (p. 313). Bormann had also issued a directive that called for total war, complete faith in victory, and absolute opposition to weaklings (Ibid.)...This “pointless action” had resulted in the needless loss of thousands of lives, after the war had already been officially acknowledged as hopelessly lost, even [by] the Fuehrer (pp. 312-313).
|
|
This book proposes a thesis arguing that the Jews are the ‘Chosen people of God’, and that Christians owe the Jews eternal sympathy for the alleged ‘Holocaust’, as well as centuries-forgotten persecution of Jews at the hands of Christians. Well, I am going to shatter this thesis because it is so weak I can hardly believe it has actually made it into print, but for Christianity’s sake, I am grateful it did. I am even more grateful that it fell into my possession. There are several points made in this proposition of ‘anti-Christianism,’ which literally made my jaw drop at the sheer rapaciousness of the arguments put forth. Suffice it to say, that this little hate tract will collapse like a deck of cards when it has been put through the grinder of scholarly scrutiny. Lutzer actually goes so far as to tweak Apocalypse to his false Christian doctrine claiming that Hitler’s alleged ‘final solution’ (which by the way was not final at all, as Jews still exist) was the “direct activity of Satan.” He claims that this can be read in the story of Apocalypse involving the “dragon” and the “woman”. Sure.
|
|
Steigmann-Gall is probably the only historian who has come to an objective and complete picture of Christianity in the Third Reich. One of the most pertinent points he makes with regards to Hitler’s personal faith, is the fact that Hitler had ardently and consistently defended the person, message, and deeds of Jesus Christ, even in the midst of paganists and anti-Christians, such as Himmler and Bormann. This is very important, because if Hitler had really thought of Jesus as ‘just another Jew,’ or had believed His message to be ‘a lie,’ then it would have come through in one of these table talks with Bormann; especially during this time when Hitler had nothing to gain or lose from espousing his honest and true views on the matter. A Close Examination of Steigmann-Gall’s The Holy Reich |
|
Haffner argues several mainstream points about Hitler that I find faulty. One of the most uniformed is his claim that Hitler had treated the women in his life “as unimportant,” and that “he did not make them happy” (p. 5). Now, this may be partially true in that Geli Raubal had been a free spirited girl who wanted to be relinquished from Hitler’s mother hen complex. His wife Eva had allegedly written on one occasion, “He only needs me for certain purposes. …When he says he loves me, it only means he loves me at that particular instant. Like his promises, which he never keeps. Why does he torment me like this, when he could finish it off at once” (Payne, p. 586). There are numerous diary entries like this one, but they are all fraudulent. Eva’s real diary was supposedly discovered just after the war and was either destroyed or vanished almost immediately after its discovery. There is no diary of Eva Braun. Excerpt: “...in January 1933, when Hitler became Reich Chancellor, there were six million unemployed in Germany. A mere three years later, in 1936, there was full employment. Crying need and mass hardship had...turned into...comfortable prosperity” (pp. 27-28). |
|
“A conference of the highest commanders of the Red Army under the Chairmanship of the People’s Commissar of Defense, Marshal of the Soviet Union Timoshenko, made the decision in December 1940 to conduct any future war as a war of attack. In January 1941, two large-scale staff war-game planning maneuvers of the top leadership cadres of the Red Army (also under the direction of the People’s Commissar of Defense and to some extent in the presence of Stalin and a few members of the Politburo) produced the first study for the execution for an offensive war against Germany (p. 54). ...What were the details of the Soviet General Staff’s plan? The above mentioned short ‘Credo of Attack’ ran as follows: ‘When one considers that Germany keeps its army mobile through the installation of rear support services, then it can preempt us [predupredit, with double underlining by General Vatutin] during deployment, and carry out a surprise attack.’ ... As a perceptive observer, Pourray, has remarked, if the Soviet General Staff feared that the Germans might preempt the Red army, this must have been because the Russians were already doing something that the Germans needed to preempt” (p. 59). |
|
The basic thesis of this book can be summarized by the proposition that Judaism must be conceptualized as a group strategy characterized by cultural and genetic segregation from gentile societies combined with resource competition and conflicts of interest with segments of gentile societies. This cultural and genetic separatism combined with resource competition and other conflicts of interest tend to result in division and hatred within the society (MacDonald, n.d.). As argued by MacDonald, the Jews were especially successful as regards their ethno-social cohesive group strategy; thus, they were able to bring [the JWV] to culmination even though some Jews opposed it. This successful ethnocentric cohesion in turn explains Jewish virulence and hostility towards German National Socialism. In the case of “Nazi” Germany the Jews were not considered part of the newfound German ingroup; rather, they were the ostracized outgroup. Hence, they became the victims of the same discriminatory attitudes and policies that they had so readily utilized in Weimar German society while acting as a cohesive ethnocentric ingroup; in even clearer terms, the Jews found themselves to be the victims of policies identical to their own. |
|
Numerous historians have utilized these letters between Martin Bormann and his wife Gerda as “proof” that he was heartless, cold, and “evil.” Even though Historian Louis Kilzer has affirmed nearly beyond any doubt that Bormann was a Soviet covert, he does not come across as such in his letters to his wife. However, his letters certainly reveal his selfishness and his uncaring attitude towards German suffering in particular. We have scanned sections of this book so that you may read these and decide for yourself what you may think of Bormann’s character. Please pay particular attention to Bormann’s letters regarding Christianity because we think it’s clear that he had not wholly divorced himself of his Christian ethos with which he was born and raised. Bormann claims that he has overcome Christianity, with its infantile and bizarre dogmatism, but, if that is true, then why does he feel he must discuss it and defend his ulterior views? It’s almost as though he had not come to a decisive conclusion or decision on the matter. It also appears that he did believe in God. Most claim he did not. Did Bormann Run Hitler For The Illuminati? by H. Makow |
|
Many historians dispute the authenticity of sections of this record, but it is still worth reading nevertheless. It may have been written by Francois Genoud—the same man who had the 1941-1944 table talk originals which may also be partially fraudulent. In light of this, these “table talks” are no less credible than the much cited Hitler’s Table Talk itself. Excerpt: “The Jews themselves have always aroused anti-Semitism. Throughout the centuries, all the peoples of the world, from the ancient Egyptians to ourselves, have reacted in exactly the same way. The time comes when they become tired of being exploited by the disgusting Jew... It is an instinctive reaction, a reaction of repugnance against a stranger who refuses to adapt himself and become part of the whole... By nature, the Jew is a parasite which cannot and will not be assimilated. A distinguishing feature of the Jew is that, unlike other foreigners, he everywhere claims all the rights of citizenship in the community that shelters him—and at the same time remains always a Jew...” The 1945 Hitler-Bormann Documents: A Theo-Historical Interpretation |
|
This book is extremely fallible and very scathing, probably because it was published without Herr Thyssen’s complete knowledge as to the exact content of what was going to be published: “Reves was also publisher of that other famous ‘source’ on early Nazi history, I Paid Hitler (London, 1943). Henry Ashby Turner, Jr. has pointed out in a paper in Vierteljahrsheft für Zeitgeshichte (No. 3, 1971) that the luckless Thyssen never even saw eight of the book’s nineteen chapters, while the rest were drafted in French” [D. Irving, Hitler’s War: Milennium Edition, p. xv]! This book was published by an anti-Nazi-Sozi Jewish propagandist named Emery Reves, who had been involved in the publication of Hermann Rauschning’s book of lies. |