|
These are just a few pages scanned in from Otto Wagener’s immense and amazing collection of memoirs entitled Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant.
The context of the conversation taking place—as recorded by Wagener in his many pages of notes—is shortly after Geli’s accidental shooting death. The mainstream historians who seem to take delight in bending history to their own agenda have failed to point up the fact that Hitler’s niece was not murdered, but rather, had accidentally shot herself while mishandling Hitler’s handgun. He left the gun for her to use in case anything ever happened while he was gone. As Wagener himself, Heinrich Hoffmann, Kurt Ludecke, Ernst Hanfstaengl, Otto Dietrich and Winifred Wagner have asserted, her death was most certainly a terrible and tragic accident.
By reading these few pages, hopefully you will come to understand how deeply affected Hitler was over her death, as he recounts not only how much she meant to him personally, but more importantly, how he acknowledges how essential women are to men in general. This may well be one of the most powerful monologues Hitler had ever delivered on this subject—or on any subject for that matter—and Wagener recorded it for obvious reasons.
Also, pay close attention to how much religious overtone the conversation contains, as Hitler’s Christian beliefs come to the fore in a very real, honest, and tangible way. I do not think that anyone could read this piece and come away from it not believing in Hitler’s complete, and rather brutally honest, sincerity when it came to the death of his niece.
Also, this piece will show that Hitler had a very real human side that could easily overtake him, especially when he experienced tragedies like this one. This is just one more piece of much needed primary evidence that will expunge the lies from Hitler studies in general, and hopefully you will come away from it having learned not only a bit more about history, but a bit more about the fragility of life and the importance of interpersonal relationships.
Moreover, Hitler’s emphasis on marriage as much more than a ‘contract’ will reveal to you that he thought on a much deeper intellectual and spiritual plane than the average person. He was unique indeed, and his outlook on marriage and women is one well worth reading.
This piece also exhibits Hitler’s sincere belief that marriage was not to be taken lightly, and he tells us why he could not marry. He did not choose not to marry out of selfishness, but rather, selflessness. I think it might also be important to note here that Eva Braun chose to be with Hitler, knowing full well that he could not marry her or give her the married life she so rightly deserved. She did not care and chose to be with him regardless, and she also chose—completely of her own accord and will—to die with him. Many historians choose to misconstrue this information as well, and they paint a morbid picture of a stormy relationship between the two; one in which Hitler mistreated Eva and called her “simple” and “stupid.”
Actually, Hitler called Eva on the phone every day while he was away, and his vacation time spent with her has been extensively documented by several of his adjutants, especially Hans Baur (his pilot).
It is not true that he called her “stupid,” as allegedly uttered by Albert Speer. He loved her for being an innocent and apolitical product of her Catholic upbringing. He wanted a woman like his mother; a kind, caring, and happy woman. The terms he more likely chose to describe her with were “pure” or “unaffected.” Traudl Junge recalled in her memoirs how immensely concerned for Eva Hitler always was, and how he always had a glow about him when she was in his presence, or even if someone mentioned her name.
Another amazing portion of this monologue is the part in which Hitler talks about day care centers. Most people do not even know that day care centers existed back in the 1930s and 1940s, but they did. Hitler did not like the idea of the day care centers, and it was his hope that he would be able to encourage women to want to raise own children and to want to be mothers, as opposed to laborers.
But, what is also worth noting, is the fact that Hitler did not proactively seek to remove women from the workforce, as he realized that young women and gifted women would certainly want to work and get an education, at least for a little while. This is yet another common misperception about Hitler’s social policies. One need only take note of Winifred Wagner, female military volunteers, women factory workers and laborers during the war years, Traudl Junge, Leni Riefenstahl, or Magda Göbbels, to come to the realization that Hitler’s policies never inhibited women.
Hitler even goes so far as to rant against some of those in his own party who had played a role in destructive policies. The idea that all of the Nazi-Sozis adhered to an identical—albeit predominantly maniacal—worldview, is untrue. Hitler did not agree with everything that was going on, especially with regards to social policies, and that too comes to the fore in this monologue.
Hitler’s emphasis on the family is also very impressive, and that really comes through in this piece. He was truly an admirer of good, solid family life, and he may have taken a particular interest in families because he did not have one. Hitler only had his sister, and the two were never close. Perhaps his lack of family life made him that much more effectual in his pro-family policies, as he enjoyed, more than most anything else, the accompaniment of his friends’ children and their relatives. Hitler visited the families of the Wagners, Göbbels’, and Bormanns quite regularly, and he always relished in their company.
The portrait of Hitler, that Jewry and its Allies have created for public consumption, is so one-sided and distorted: it’s truly unbelievable. And now they use the alleged holocaust as an ideological weapon, which is utterly politicized, in order to subject Arabs to mass discrimination, persecution, and genocide? Unconscionable. Now, back to the Jewish portrait of Hitler before I forget...essentially what we have is Jewish garbage that was produced for the “Allies”. Kurt Krueger never even existed according to historians Ian Sayer and Douglas Botting (The Women Who Knew Hitler, 2004). His “memoirs” fail to meet even the most basic validation checks against legitimate sources. I have also noticed that “Dr. Krueger” cleverly left out dates and places during all of his so-called “conversations” with Hitler. That is one of the first signs of fraudulence. The fact that this Jewish doctor was supposedly a creature of Freud’s ought to throw most of the much needed light on his scene. Yes, he was allegedly a student of the coke-fiend Sigmund “Bisexual Jewish Pedophile” Freud. Even historians Ian Sayer and Douglas Botting have asserted that Krueger’s sessions are “alleged” and certainly not confirmed or validated. Indeed, Krueger is the only one who has made the claims he has. He must be dismissed out of hand unless he can check as valid against at least one other reliable source. The question amounts to, who actually wrote his alleged “diary”?
The next problem child on the list is Otto Strasser. Everything Strasser said about Hitler is a lie. No legitimate historian, Jews inclusive, accepts the recollections of Otto Strasser. He hated Hitler and had a terrible political falling out with the man. That alone should raise brows as to his claims.
Konrad Heiden is yet another Jewish “source” who has failed to meet even the most basic validation checks. He alleged that Hitler sketched lewd portraits of his step-niece and locked them away in a safe somewhere in the Treasury Department. Neither the safe nor the sketches have ever been found. Once again we have an individual who has stated things about Hitler’s private life that cannot and will not be verified. We must assume that he lied about everything.
Mimi Reiter is a fairly reliable source, I believe, but she must be read with a grain of salt. She comes off as a dull woman with a terrible codependency problem.
There is absolutely no evidence indicating that Hitler had a sexual relationship with his step-niece. The true story appears to be that Geli was perhaps infatuated with Hitler, but she apparently fell in love with and wanted to marry his Jewish chauffeur, Emile Maurice. Hitler would have none of that for fairly obvious reasons. As indicated by Sayer and Botting Hitler had said, “I make it my business to watch over her until such time as she finds a husband to her taste” (p. 50). Hitler might just as easily have said “...finds a husband to my taste.” As aforementioned, he would not allow her to choose Maurice as her future husband. Geli displayed all the signs of a coda. It is this character flaw which appears to be the main factor behind her tragic suicide. She was allegedly “jealous” of Eva Braun’s relationship with Hitler. More truthfully, he would not allow her to escape his overbearing and imposing overprotectiveness; it is clear that she either had a crush on him or truly loved him. Her love remained unrequited in that respect because she wanted only to marry. Hitler certainly loved the girl and thought that she was gorgeous, but that was all. He refused to marry and that was the end of it. As far as anyone thinking that a marriage between these two was incestuous or odd is sheer nonsense. Consanguine marriages were still fairly common in the world at the time. Heinrich Hoffmann, Hitler’s friend and personal photographer, thought absolutely nothing odd about a possible marriage between the two of them. I am absolutely stunned at people’s ignorance in this regard. Many cultures still practice this today. How do you think Jews have maintained their most notable racial characteristics?
More Hitler Lies Exposed: Debunking the “Hitler-Geli” Clap-Trap
I found this online: “The women in Hitler's life had uniformly tragic fates. Geli Raubal, Hitler's 20-year-younger half-niece and romantic obsession, was found dead in her bed [wrong, she had fallen from her chair] on 9/19/1931 with a bullet through her chest and Hitler's gun by her side, in the Berlin apartment that she shared with her uncle. “A mysterious darkness surround the death of this unusual beauty,” the newspapers wrote. Whether the death was a murder or suicide has never been resolved. There was a hasty attempt to cover up the death with the announcement of suicide “that she was nervous about an upcoming recital.” The Munchner Post wrote that “Herr Hitler and his niece had yet another fierce quarrel.” The report continued that the 23-year-old girl wanted to go to Vienna, where she intended to become engaged. Here is a much more accurate and objective version of the story of Geli’s suicide.
Hitler had actually addressed this very issue. “Geli’s death had shaken my friend to the depths of his soul. Had he a feeling of guilt? Was he torturing himself with remorseful self-reproach? What would he do” (Hoffman, 157)?
And, shortly after Unity Mitford shot herself [because Churchill had declared war on Hitler and Unity had a crush on the Fuehrer], Hitler said: “You know, Hoffman, I’m beginning to be frightened of women! Whenever I happen to show a little personal interest—by a look or by paying some little compliment—it is always misinterpreted. I bring women no luck! And that’s a fact which repeats itself in a most unusual and fateful way throughout my life!” Hoffmann recalled: “Involuntarily, my thoughts went back to the death at an early age of his mother, to Geli’s suicide, to Eva’s attempt to take her own life, and then to Unity… In 1921, when Hitler was still quite unknown, this woman tried to hang herself in a hotel room; but fortunately she was found in time” (Ibid., 166-67).
Heinrich Hoffmann had further stated:
“Geli was deeply revered, indeed worshipped by her uncle, and any idea of an affair between them most certainly never entered his head. To him she was the personification of perfect young womanhood—beautiful, fresh and unspoiled, gay and intelligent, and as clean and as straight as God made her. He watched and gloated over her like some savant with a rare and lovely bloom, and to cherish and protect her was his one and only concern. … But Geli… wanted to be free, to move about and to meet people, not to sit quietly at the same café table day after day with some rather solemn faces. … ‘I love Geli, and I could marry her; but you know my views and you know that I am determined to remain a bachelor.’ … ‘Hoffman,’ Hitler said, … ‘I cannot remain in this house where my Geli died…” (Ibid., 50-56). As evidenced in this passage, a marriage relationship between relatives was not viewed as out-of-the-ordinary at that time, as Hoffmann thought nothing of it. If Hitler had maintained some dark secret as these jokers like to claim, then why in the world would he discuss such a thing so openly with Hoffmann? It’s just so stupid what these idiots try and come up with. And then, at the same time, we are all supposed to think that Freud’s incest (of his daughter) is okay and that Ira Isaacs’ admitted sexual deviance is “art”? This is a great example of Jewish hypocrisy, which riddles their research.
I found this trash online too: “Hitler first was captivated by Geli (short for Angela) [actually short for Angelika] in 1925, when she was 17. He persuaded her and her mother, his half-sister, to serve as his live-in housekeepers, [nope, wrong again, Hitler never wanted Geli as a “housekeeper”] first at his mountain retreat at Berchtesgaden. Before long “Uncle Alf” had ensconced the girl into an apartment building next to his in Munich and was escorting her to cafes and cinemas. He hovered at her side, the picture of an infatuated adolescent. In 1929, he moved her into his apartment. Historians have debated the nature of their relationship ever since, debating the assertion that Hitler was entirely asexual to the belief that he led a normal sexual life, to stories of perversions and phobias. It has been established that Hitler had one testicle and that he had a huge pornographic collection [neither of these things has been established, as there is evidence that stands counter to both of these insidious claims]. Whatever the explicit form Hitler's affections took, it seemed evident that Geli was increasingly confined and resistant to her position.”
It’s rather amusing, but also very sickening, that so many people actually think that Hitler had an affair with Angelika Raubal. This is quite inaccurate. Heinrich Hoffman (Hitler Was My Friend), Otto Wagener (Hitler-Memoirs of a Confidant), as well as Ernst Hanfstaengl (Hitler's Piano Player and Putzi’s Hitler-The Missing Years), and Otto Dietrich (The Hitler I Knew) have all talked in great detail about Hitler’s relationship with his step-niece, and none of them thought that it was abnormal.
Hitler doted upon his step-niece as a father would a favorite daughter. He did not love her in a sexual way, though his love for her transcended typical loving relationships experienced between most family members. I think she reminded him of his mom, as his mom was his best friend in the whole world. One need only read Dr. Bloch’s recollection of Hitler’s love for his mom. Or perhaps, The Young Hitler I Knew would be good enough on this point. The alleged “diaries” of Geli as well as the allegations that Hitler regularly sketched her nude body have all been debunked. In fact, according to historian Frederic Spotts, the Geli Raubal nude sketches were solely the work of the forger Konrad Kujau (Hitler and the Power of Aesthetics, 144-145). So, don’t believe any old historian until you double-check their sources. Kujau forged thousands of Hitler sketches and he wrote Hitler’s diary for him. David Irving was the only historian that noticed the obvious fraudulent qualities of Hitler’s so-called “dairy.”
What is odd is that there have been plenty of Jews who loved their daughters and/or step-nieces; though, some went so far as to actually act upon it, unlike Hitler. Hitler had class and tact and this is something that Jews cannot fathom; therefore, they attempt to paint any kind of doting relationship as incestual—especially those between young women and older men, or between relatives—when in fact, the ones who see the incestuousness are generally the ones with the problem. Otto Strasser has been denounced as “a crackpot” by several historians and scholars (Rudolph Binion, n.d.). See “Hitler and Murray’s Hitler,” accessed November 4, 2006, from http://org.law.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/articles/8_1_1.pdf.) The accuracy of the allegations of Otto Strasser, as regards anything about Hitler, must be subject to severe scrutiny before coming to any definitive conclusions. Strasser loathed Hitler and made up all kinds of fairytales about him for both the foreign press outfits and the Allied psychological case file (OSS).
Binion has stated: “Hitler presented himself to his public as a man without an intimate domestic life, dedicated to his political “mission”. He is known to have had a fiancée, Mimi Reiter in the 1920s, and to have later had a mistress, Eva Braun. He had a close bond with his niece Geli Raubal, which many commentators have claimed was sexual. All three women attempted suicide during their relationship with him, a fact which has led to speculation that Hitler may have had unusual sexual fetishes, though Reiter, the only one to survive the Nazi regime, denies this [Eva never wrote about, or spoke of Hitler’s being a sexual pervert either, by the way. Not once]. During the war and afterwards psychoanalysts offered numerous inconsistent psycho-sexual explanations of his pathology. More recently [Jewish wannabe historian] Lothar Machtan has argued in his book The Hidden Hitler that Hitler was homosexual” (Source: Rosenbaum, R., “Was Hitler ‘unnatural’”, Explaining Hitler: The Search for the Origins of his Evil, Macmillan, 1998, 99-117. Rosenbaum, op. cit., 116).”
So, we have to rely on Freudian psychoanalysis, (which is wholly debunked), speculation, and two Jewish authors named Rosenbaum and Machtan, in order to make this fairytale hold together? Furthermore, we are supposed to believe that Eva and Adolf never had sexual relations? All men need some form of sexual relationship, let us just get that right out there, and proof of an intimate relationship has been established by Frau Winter and the fact that Eva used birth control. Do not buy the lies. Hitler was completely normal. As recorded by historian John Toland, Captain Wiedemann had “accidentally” gone up to the Fuehrer’s hotel suite a bit too soon, and he saw, just outside the door, Hitler’s boots right next to Eva Braun’s “petite Viennese shoes.” Wiedemann started laughing as he walked back down the stairs and later recorded the following in his memoirs: “I could not help recalling La Fontaine’s fable...and I burst out laughing as I went downstairs” (Hitler: The Definitive Biography, 534).
Now, getting back to my previous point, Sigmund Freud was a sexually-sadistic garbage bag who had more than likely molested young girls during his so-called “research.” Hitler thought his theories were twisted and weird…gee, I wonder why? Freud saw penises everywhere because he was the one with the problem; though, he tried to impart his own sickness onto everyone else. It’s typical Jewish pseudo-science. Everyone but the Jews have a problem. This is why they believe that they will rule the world. Their arrogance and sadism is unprecedented and the stereotypes about Jews have their roots in observable truths and realities. Take a looksie at Weimar Germany. Of course the Jews try and portray the Fuehrer as the “sicko.” Their guilty consciences know no bounds, no truths, no class.
The following passage on the pseudo-psychiatrist, coke-fiend Jew, Sigmund Freud, should shed some light on Jewish filth:
“[Freud’s] admiration for the young doctor bordered on the extremely creepy. In 1896 he wrote in a letter to Fleiss: Your kind should not die out, my dear friend; the rest of us need people like you too much. How much I owe you: solace, understanding, stimulation in my loneliness, meaning to my life that I gained through you, and finally even health that no one else could have given back to me. It is primarily through your example that intellectually I gained the strength to trust my judgment, even when I am left alone—though not by you—and like you, to face with lofty humility all the difficulties that the future may bring. For all that, accept my humble thanks! I know that you do not need me as much as I need you, but I also know that I have a secure place in your affection. “To all outsiders, Freud exhibited all the symptoms of a man in love. He shared intimacies about his disappointing sex life with Martha, and told him all the dark secrets of his emotional health. There was only one problem—Fleiss was a nutter. “He was a master of quackery, a snake-oil merchant of the very first order. He and Freud spent long nights together concocting hare-brained theories. “And Fleiss had a corker. He believed that the nose was the centre of all human illness—both physical and psychological. Rather in the way that phrenologists believed that the bumps on your head dictate the kind of person you are Freud wholeheartedly agreed. And why not? High on cocaine, he was soaring at dizzy heights somewhere outside the galaxy. The two congratulated each other on their genius, named their new science “nasal reflex neurosis” and got down to working out the details.” [Source]
...
“Sigmund Freud (1856 - 1939) was the creator of psychoanalysis, and is considered the first person to scientifically explore the human unconscious mind. His ideas profoundly influenced the shape of modern culture by altering man's view of himself. Of course, his influence has been an entirely negative one. For when one examines the core of Freudian thought, when one strips away all the pseudo-scientific mumbo-jumbo, one discovers only the perverted philosophy of the pedophile. According to Freud, normal, healthy human development was dependent upon the individual participating in heterosexual activity by age 6. Anything later, Freud believed, and the child would not develop a normal sex drive—but instead would suffer from massive guilt and suicidal tendencies. Of course, any sane person knows that the exact opposite is true. Yet this has not deterred our schools and universities from continuing to regard the pervert Freud as a genius. And even a casual glance at the 20th century landscape reveals the increasingly pedophilized nature of Western Culture. From Coppertone ads featuring a dog ripping the swimsuit off a 4 year old girl (a curious mix of bestiality and Freudian pedophilism) to the slick Calvin Klein ads which promote slim-hipped, invisible-breasted, pubescent-shaped females as the ideal in the beauty, to the international organized pedophile sex rings (as recently exposed in Belgium), we are living in the Age of Kiddie Porn. “Now that we understand who Freud was, let us once again consider his statement that Dostoevsky “could have been mankind's liberator—but instead, he chose to be its jailer.” It is meant, in the mind of the pervert Freud, to assign failure. It is meant to bemoan the fact that Dostoevsky wasted his enormous talents promoting an outdated “philosophy.” It is meant to imply that had Dostoevsky championed perversion, man, indeed, would have been liberated. For Freud knew very well that in a world which accepted the ideas of Dostoevsky, Freud himself would, indeed, be jailed. And the disgusting fact that Freud was never jailed, but instead hailed as a “great man of science,” is a sad sign of the times indicating that the guiding light Dostoevsky followed has all but been forgotten. What was Dostoevsky's guiding light? What lay at the core of all his great masterworks of literature that so angered the pedophile Freud? For the answer, let us look back to December 22, 1849, on a bitterly cold morning in Semenovsky Square, St. Petersburg, Russia.” [Source]
Not to mention, the Jew-worshipping Hanfstaengl was the one who accused Hitler of the “Oedipus Complex”, yet, he never even claimed that Hitler loved his step-niece or had intercourse with her. As a matter of fact, Putzi claimed that Hitler never even had sex at all: he was completely and utterly asexual, which cannot be true because Eva Braun wrote candidly in her real diary upon Loyd George's visit to the Berghof, “If only he knew what we had done on that sofa” [not verbatim…see the DVD Adolf and Eva]. I should not even have to repeat that Eva used birth control. By the way, Hitler affectionately called Eva his “little one.”
Lastly, it was one of the Strasser brothers who declared that he had heard that Hitler was some sex-pervert. One cannot honestly trust either of the Strassers, as they were both defectors and sell-outs who decided to side with the Jews. No one can trust their “testimony.” Strasser was the moron who collaborated in the writing of the ludicrous fairytale, I Was Hitler’s Doctor. The author, Kurt Krueger, who never even existed, claims that Hitler stabbed some broad in the chest while making love to her, realized she was gushing blood, and then rushed here to this “doctor” for treatment. Please… I mean, really now. It was Otto Strasser, the Jew-worshipper, who wrote the scurrilous and lie-filled intro, along with a few other jerks, like Upton Sinclair, and some other nobody named K. Arvin Enlind, M.D. Enlind wrote a “Preface,” because the story was too stupid to believe, without the paid authority of a Jewish “modern-day” doctor. [See Krueger, K. (1943). I Was Hitler’s Doctor. Baltimore Publishing Co, Inc. (Original publication date 1941)].
Numerous sources have confirmed that the only sexual relationship Hitler committed to was one with Eva Braun, so I will leave it at that. If anyone had a complex at all, it was Geli, as she was the one who committed suicide. Hitler loved Eva, not Geli, and this is the much more believable and plausible reason for her suicide, if it was indeed intentional. This has not been proven either. She may have accidentally shot herself (see Otto Wagener’s Memoirs of a Confidant), or she may have been murdered (perhaps by communists or even Strasser loyalists). None of Hitler’s reliable adjutants, even the ones who defected and slandered him later on, have said anything about Hitler being sexually or relationally abnormal, except for Putzi, who claimed he never went further than “making out.” You should read Putzi’s memoirs—The Missing Years—they are quite hilarious, to say the least.
Also, most people know that women in general are extremely unstable and emotional rocking chairs, so if Geli took her life it really comes as no surprise, especially in light of the fact that she was a typical coda [codependent]. Coda women are extremely unstable. She may have even been bipolar. Eva also had the traits of a coda. Apparently, Der Führer could not avoid the Coda types, which stands to reason: he had a somewhat abusive father. He had a bit of an ‘addict’ personality, no doubt.
This trash I also found online: “Was this one death meaningless in the face of the millions to come? Or was it the cornerstone, the symbol of the ultimate power of a madman, the power of death itself?” Here is the source for this clap-trap. It is hard to believe that such grotesque lies continue to assert themselves online. For the real Hitler without the Jewish perversions, click here.
|
|
Hitler on Geli’s Death, Marriage, and Women & The Lies about Hitler’s Private Life Exposed Commentary by AHRS |