“Nazi Terror: A Jewish National Socialist’s Account”Courtesy of AHRS This essay is in commemoration of only those Jews and Mischlinge who fought and died for Adolf Hitler. Part I: Jews Had Guns in Hitler’s Reich Courtesy of Rense.com
According to Heinz Weichardt (2004), “The next anti-Jewish measure was the Arier paragraph, which eliminated non-Aryans from all government positions. Everybody with one quarter or more Jewish background was considered non-Aryan.
Exempt from this law were all Jews who had fought for Germany in the World War or had lost sons during that war or who already held government positions before that war. Certain exemptions for meritorious individuals could be granted. All non-Aryans in government positions had to be retired (not fired!) with their pensions forthcoming. Businesses, large or small, were not affected; doctors could continue their practices but were not compensated for treating patients insured under the government-run health plan. Many, many—including high party officials—stayed with their Jewish family doctors who had treated them for a long time. The number of university students of three-quarter or all-Jewish ancestry were limited to the percentage of their numbers in the populace. Still pretty good, when compared with the experience of deserving whites under Jewish-imposed affirmative action in America. Students with one-half or less Jewish ancestry were under no restrictions at all, and even had, at a later date, to join the nationalist student organization. They were not permitted to join the SA or SS. Joining a nationalist organization became, in effect, obligatory for all Aryan students. The immediate effect on the private lives of most Jews was in the beginning only minimal. Some personal experiences will show this. Since my early teens I had been an avid gun lover. In Austria, where we lived at the time, there were in effect no restrictions on the possession of handguns or rifles. If there were, they certainly were not enforced. At the age of fifteen, I could walk into one of the finest gun shops in Vienna and purchase any weapon in the store, as long as I had the necessary money. Unfortunately I didn't, but after some time I had scraped together a sufficient amount to start my modest collection by acquiring three low-priced handguns. Shortly thereafter, in 1929, we moved to Berlin. In Germany, under the Weimar Republic, one had to register each gun with the police. There were no restrictions on possession except if you wanted to carry them. In this case you had to have a hunting license which required a lengthy course in gun handling, marksmanship, game laws and the handling of bagged game. The police had absolutely no say or power to refuse you the ownership of your guns when you came to register. It was a purely bureaucratic measure which enabled the police to trace a gun involved in a criminal action. My guns were registered in the name of my (Jewish) mother, who had contributed the money for their original purchase, because I was only fifteen years old and could not own firearms until I reached maturity (21 years). After Hitler came to power, nothing was changed in the existing gun regulations; nobody had to turn in the registered guns—period. My mother still had them on the day of her immigration to the US (May 1941) and gave them to a friend of mine because importation of firearms was prohibited under US law. The laxness with which the firearm laws were enforced was clearly demonstrated in the days after the Reichstag fire, when most people feared an imminent Communist uprising. Suddenly, untold numbers of veterans or members of patriotic organizations were seen walking around, proudly displaying their wartime military Mausers or Parabellums strapped to their sometimes paunchy bellies. After a while, after the communist threat had been eliminated, they were politely reminded that carrying of firearms in public was against the law and the guns were put back into drawers at home. The sale of ammunition was never restricted. Suddenly a long-time dream of mine promised to come true: the ownership of a genuine Parabellum in good condition. One of my friends had heard of a deal whereby members of the many existing nationalist party organizations could purchase retired army pistols in lots of one hundred at a price of fifteen marks per gun. The price of a new Parabellum was one hundred and fifty marks in those days, which was about the monthly income of a lowly worker, if he had a job. My search for prospective customers was frantic. By charging an extra mark for my services I had to sell only fifteen guns to earn sufficient money for the purchase of a gun for myself! Alas, my plan was of short duration. Some envious or overzealous citizen felt obliged to inform the authorities of my dreamy deal. It was followed by the famous knock on the door, and on opening I faced three agents of the secret police (Gestapo). No hands in the pockets groping for hidden arms, no shouted orders or threats, only showing of identifications and the polite question if I had any firearms at home and if they could see them. I asked them in, got my guns and asked my mother to show the registration receipts. The disappointment of the rather mild-mannered gentlemen at the measly display was obvious and they asked about the whereabouts of the one hundred Parabellums I was suspected of harboring. My heart sank and I told them about my, now surely aborted, hoped-for big deal, which as yet had not been completed. They looked greatly relieved and the man in charge said that a perfunctory search of our premises was in order. No drawers were ripped out and emptied, nothing was displaced or damaged—only a short look under beds, into armoires and storage cabinets. When they were ready to leave the man in charge spotted a letter on the table with a Jewish-sounding name of the sender and being obviously informed about my mother’s racial background he very kindly admonished her that because of the new conditions prevalent to be especially careful and not to break any of the existing laws. With that they apologized for the inconvenience they had caused and left. My loaded guns remained on the table. In order fully to appreciate this story you must remember that the Parabellum was at that time still the most powerful and sophisticated military handgun on the European market. Today’s equivalent would be a fully automatic MP5 or Ingram. Just imagine somebody informing the “democratic” American government that I was stocking one hundred of those, possibly intending to sell them to some shady characters harboring racist or otherwise non-PC views. Can't you just hear Janet Reno screaming and ordering her trigger-happy minions into action? The roar of armored trucks loaded with SWAT teams in full battledress would be deafening and reinforced by the clatter of helicopter-gunships hovering overhead, in case any difficulties should develop. The headlines would shout: Gun Crazy Rightist Has Arsenal Endangering His Neighborhood! Governor Might Call In National Guard! Remember the recent actions of the American government in the case of a man who sold a shotgun, allegedly one quarter inch shorter than the law permits, to an undercover agent, which resulted in the deaths of a mother holding a baby in her arms, one unarmed child, the family dog and a marshal. Or the one involving a religious nut who could have been arrested any day by a single cop while the former attended to his shopping in the local supermarket. Result: about eighty people, mostly women and children, incinerated alive. I think my imagined scenario above is an understatement. My next run-in with the authorities of the Third Reich happened about three years later and was a little more ominous. I had just received the notification that my application for voluntary service in the newly-recruited army had been definitely denied and I was understandably very bitter because service in the armed forces was considered an honor and privilege, not an onerous duty. Instead of swallowing my badly injured pride I complained to everybody who would listen to me, ending my complaints with the caustic question: ‘Why me, when even the top general of the Luftwaffe, Erhard Milch, had a Jewish father?’ Well it didn’t take very long for the knock at the door. This time I faced three members of the Algemeine-SS. The situation was made worse by my little Dachshund. She had a dislike for tall men in black uniform and immediately attacked the intruders, loudly barking and snapping. The SS retreated a few steps until I had taken control of the objecting animal. The precautionary shooting of pet animals was definitely not PC in Hitler’s Germany. Besides, no member of a uniformed organization, except army and police, was ever permitted to carry firearms publicly in order to emphasize their non-military character. After the three men had entered our apartment, I was severely admonished for spreading insulting rumors about high-level army officers [Erhard Milch in this case. Milch was, in all probability, a full-blooded Jew]. All I could say was that I was absolutely sure that the father of General Erhard Milch was buried in the Jewish cemetery in Dessau, home of the famous Junkers aircraft works. I will never forget the stunned expressions on the faces of the three as they left, this time without apologies, in a huff. I did not hear from them again. Of course I knew that the statement to which they objected was true” (pp. 13-17). As a matter of fact, historian Bryan Rigg has confirmed that Erhard Milch was indeed at least half-Jewish, but possibly even full Jewish (Clark, 2006). Hitler had even agreed to fake his papers to get him into the Army. Part II: The Experiences and Reflections of Heinz Weichardt by AHRS
According to Weichardt (2004), “…I must state categorically that during my nearly six years under the Hitler regime, living at the center of power in Berlin with my father, who as a journalist was in constant touch with the authorities (he had, for example, to attend, together with other journalists, confidential monthly meetings with Propaganda Minister Goebbels to obtain political directives and listen to pep-talks), and aware of all nasty anti-government rumors, I had neither a single personal contact with anybody who had suffered physical harm from the authorities of the Third Reich, nor did I hear from anybody among my rather extended acquaintances that they knew of anybody who had. Yes, yes, I know there was the nasty Röhm affair…which was an inter-party matter” (p. 19).
So, in other words, Weichardt knew of rumors, but neither he nor any of his Jewish acquaintances had witnessed or fallen victim to National Socialist “terrorism.” Moreover, his father was a Jewish journalist who had met regularly with Dr. Goebbels. Furthermore, Weichardt is overtly honest in his recollection of the almost immediate mass exodus of “well-to-do” and “prominent” Jews who had “exposed themselves politically.” He also has not neglected to mention that most countries outside of Germany would not accept Jewish émigrés. Weichardt recounts, “The remaining Jews also had to suffer because of the vicious propaganda which was launched abroad by the Jewish-controlled press and by some of the émigrés” (p. 19). Notice he says “Jewish-controlled press” and not “Nazi controlled press”? Also, take note of the fact that Weichardt discusses the vicious propaganda “abroad”—in other words, numerous countries, other than Germany, were engaging in vicious, anti-Jewish propaganda; the United States inclusive.
According to Weichardt (2004), Hitler fulfilled the “Diktat,” as established by the League of Nations, by demonstrating his willingness to disarm. He hoped that by being the first to disarm others would quickly get the picture and follow suit. That is not what happened. “France had the largest air force in the world, England had the largest fleet, Russia the largest number of active soldiers and tanks, Poland heavily armed and sounding as aggressive as ever, the Czech army probably the most efficient of the lot and Italy, under Mussolini, was at that time still hostile towards Germany” (p. 20). So, Hitler’s bordering neighbors refused to recognize his peaceful gestures—he quickly got the picture and began rearming Germany at an unprecedented rate. It would not be farfetched to say that Hitler was uncanny enough to “read the writing on the wall,” as they say.
Upon coming to power Hitler had announced, during an international radio address on 16 October 1933, that “‘The German people and the German government have demanded absolutely no weapons…but rather, equal rights. If the world decides to eliminate all weapons right down to the last machine-gun, then we are ready to join such a convention. If the world decides to abolish particular kinds of weapons, then we are ready to do without them right from the start. But if the world decides that only certain nations may arm, but others may not, then we are not ready to allow ourselves to be excluded as a people with fundamentally fewer rights.’” Indeed, this is the same situation with Iran today. Iran is not going to simply stand by as a menial player, that receives no respect or sovereignty, while Jewsrael continues to hoard nuclear armaments in an effort to “spread democracy” and “destroy Islam” in the Middle East. That is a complete infringement upon the respective national sovereignties of every independent non-Jewish nation-state in the region. To ask any people to allow this bigotry to continue is folly. It would be the equivalent of North Korea demanding that the US disarm or be ready for dire international sanctions, while at the same time, North Korea was arming Canada and Mexico. Inane! Hitler was no devil for asserting the rights of his people; the same is true of President Ahmadinejad.
“Throughout the 1930s, [Hitler] offered proposal after proposal for mutual European disarmament, only to find himself vilified in the Allied press as a “war monger” (Schaerffenberg, p. 29). Hitler even reduced the number of German warships by 35%—a gesture of peace towards England (p. 29). It was England, not Germany, that refused to abide by its own Treaty of Versailles dictates. The British refused to reduce the size of the Royal Navy even though it was a mandate of the treaty they had supposedly drafted. Hitler had even renounced any and all claims to “disputed territories” in order to appease the French—these were regions where vast numbers of Germans still lived, like Alsace-Lorraine (p. 30). He was repeatedly rebuffed and threatened by the French, so he finally sent some troops to reoccupy the rightful German region of the Rhineland (p. 30). Indeed, “thousands and thousands” of German families had been forcibly ousted by the French during that brutal occupation of German land (p. 31). Goering and Hitler had even agreed to propose an alliance with Poland against the Jewish-led USSR (p. 37). Polish sovereignty would have been sustained, while at the same time been defended by both German and Polish lives upon invasion by Soviet forces.
Furthermore, according to historian A.V. Schaerffenberg (2003), “Hitler did not “rule without consent.” He was elected into power by the German people, and his election results were stultifying—“plebiscites consistently approved of the National Socialist regime by 90 percent or more, most often in the upper range of that percentile. …Of the 2.94 million ballots cast in the Sudetenland elections of 4 December 1938, 2.64 million votes (98.9%) went to the NSDAP. Earlier that same year, when Hitler asked the Austrian people if they wanted to become part of the Third Reich, 99.7 percent responded in the affirmative. No democratic elections on earth, before or since, ever polled that kind of approval rating” (p. 10). Now, it is possible that perhaps some of these voters felt, coerced, threatened, obligated or, that they had no other choice but, even when taking those factors into account, the percentiles are still unprecedented. Furthermore, every democratic election entails some form of coercion, fear, and/or corruption. That is unavoidable no matter what type of government you have. Weichardt (2004) has claimed, “…92.5% of the eligible voters backed the new government. Since I voted in several elections, together with my mother, until the autumn of 1938, when I left for the US, I can assure everybody that there was never any coercion or fraud involved in these elections” (p. 20).
Interestingly enough, in 1930, “United States voters…showed that they considered Il Duce the most brilliant and desirable statesman on earth. Even the ordinarily hostile Encyclopaedia Britannica had to admit that ‘Mussolini remained a hero to his own people and was profoundly respected around the world. The American Cardinal O’Connell of Boston said that Mussolini was a genius given to Italy by God; Winston Churchill declared that he himself would have donned the Fascist black shirt, had he been an Italian’.” As a matter of fact, Fascist movements were springing up everywhere in the world up until 1939—“from the British Fascist Union and Ireland’s Blue Shirts to the Russian Fascist Union and America’s Silver Shirts” (pp. 10-11).
Mussolini and Hitler both advocated and worked for peaceful negotiation, understanding and cooperation, but the so-called “Western democracies” proved too hostile to accommodate. As succinctly and accurately noted by Schaerffenberg (2003), “Capitalism, the old doctrine of international financial domination, and Marxism’s bid for world tyranny stood against the new spirit of national self-reliance of Fascism” (p. 12). Indeed, had it not been for the treachery and espionage of Soviet conspirators, the Wehrmacht High Command, and Wilhelm Canaris—“divulging the secret workings of Enigma” for 10,000 marks—the Axis powers would have won the Second World War, and Reinhard Heydrich would probably have survived it (Schaerffenberg, p. 20). Heyrich was only about a day away from arresting Canaris for his treachery, sabotage, and treason—“that is why he was murdered” (p. 28).
According to Weichardt (2004), Germany had to get off the gold standard and utilize exchange-based trade with foreign countries in order to stay afloat. Even so, her economy boomed, while that of Britain and America wallowed. Even Weichardt condemns the Jewish bankers and gangsters in this regard. He has stated, “This last measure was probably the real beginning of WWII. The world banking system simply could not permit this upstart to free his nation from their shackles. If his bold try became a success their whole empire would begin to crumble, because others might be emboldened to try the same gambit. Horrors over horrors, it did become a success. Germany’s economic recovery became meteoric, unemployment disappeared rapidly while the rest of the world was floundering in an ever-worsening depression” (p. 20).
The Roehm Affair
Weichardt describes the Roehm assassination as “the only serious crisis” that developed during Hitler’s Fuehrership (p. 20). He goes on to describe how the SA became so swollen in its ranks—many of its members ex-Communists—that it had the potential to seriously rival the German Armed Forces—Reichswehr (Ibid.). In fact, the SA probably desired to eliminate the “old guard,” and certainly had the potential and numbers to do so. Roehm wanted to lead a bloody massacre, so he was downright disappointed in Hitler’s refusal to orchestrate another putsch. Hitler decided that he would have to be elected into power, no matter how difficult that may prove to be.
At the same time, Rosenfeld, Churchill and Vansittart were orchestrating an anti-German, anti-Hitler “hate campaign,” with both the Press and the Peerage. It became all the more urgent and imperative that Germany secure for herself a strong military force; in order to keep these Jew-ridden belligerents at bay (p. 21). Roehm wanted to “incorporate” the SA into the “new army,” while he secured for himself the position of Minister of Defense. According to Weichardt, “This was anathema to the very conservative general staff” (Ibid.). Indeed, several of the SA wanted to settle old scores with their enemies and willed to instigate a bloody vendetta against them. Moreover, they wanted to institute “a more ‘socialistic’ approach to the country’s problems.” This more than likely means that they were more inclined to the communistic way of thinking than the nationalistic way of thinking. Hence, Hitler was caught between his—so far, loyal—SA and the Reichswehr “old guard.” Weichardt has described it as follows: “Hitler knew, of course, that, if he decided for Roehm and against the Reichswehr, he would face a major upheaval and possible destruction of all his hard-won gains. He was therefore forced to acquiesce in the generals’ demands and liquidate Roehm. To avoid any revolt within the SA, this had to be done with surgical precision and it cost the lives of eighty-eight men. Please compare this number with Stalin’s contemporaneous purging of his army [an estimated 30,000 were systematically murdered]” (p. 21).
It turns out that a certain little Jewish lady was “victimized by the Roehm affair” because her husband, Dr. Schmidt, was killed in a “case of mistaken identity.” Of course she was extremely upset, so she “went in a rage directly to Hitler’s office.” Hitler was wholly embarrassed by this fiasco, so he offered her “all kinds of compensations,” as well as, status as “an honorary Arian with all the ensuing privileges.” She accepted everything but the honorary status and took off for the United States. She ended up marrying one of Weichardt’s colleagues. That is how he learned of this first-hand account (pp. 21-22).
Historian David Irving has explained that Hitler’s hit list did not contain that many names. Indeed, there were only a few names, but a few of his adjutants had their own scores to settle; so, they went ahead and usurped Hitler’s authority while at the same time using his hit list as the general order for their own personal vendettas. Hitler cannot possibly be indicted for the crimes of others, even if they used his general authority. He did not find out about it until it was all said and done. He was quite embarrassed and certainly not at all thrilled that he now had to explain to his SA and SS that this was all necessary to keep the calm.
Germano-Reich Superiority Over Judeo-American Mediocrity
Weichardt has described Rosenfeld’s hatred for Germany, and most notably Hitler, as “pathological” (p. 22). He explains why he thinks Rosenfeld is so jealous in the following passage:
…To understand his rage one must compare the rapid recovery of a small resourceless country which had been held down and ransacked by its enemies with the meager results of his policies as president of the then still richest nation in the world, which was suffering under a seemingly never-ending depression. While Hitler was able to raise capital through loans from the top industrialists—they must have been sitting on it during the largely distrusted Weimar regime—by giving them ironclad guarantees for repayment, Rosenfeld was unsuccessful in obtaining them from the powerful capitalists in his country, who were more interested in obtaining maximum returns on their investments than in the well being of their nation.
…The situation could only be remedied by stirring up a little war which would guarantee huge profits in a revitalized heavy industry and loosen the money in the pockets of the recalcitrant bankers and industrialists. It is therefore understandable that already as early as 1934—one year before the first soldier was enlisted into Germany’s new Wehrmacht—plans were laid in America for the creation of a strategic bomber force which could only be used in the brutal extermination of the civilians of any nation trying to defend herself from subjection to the imperialistic rule of the bankers or Bolsheviks, both striving for world domination. England followed with the building of a fleet of heavily armed, long-range bombers but Germany never even anticipated the development of planes solely to be used against civilians. In a recent biography written by Germany’s most prominent aircraft designer, Messerschmidt, the decision to rely primarily on tactical airplanes was pushed through by the above-mentioned General Erhard Milch. It proved to be disastrous during the coming war, which was imposed on Germany by Rosenfeld and his Kehilla of advisers. In March of 1935 the new Wehrmacht was established and every young German had to serve in the army for one year. The time of compulsory service in the French army was three years, as it had been for over sixty years” (p. 22)!
As we can clearly see from this recollection, even if it is somewhat faulty or embellished, Hitler was not the one who started the Second World War. Historians of sound and objective mind have examined the evidence and have confirmed this to be the case, by and far. Historian A.V. Schaerffenberg actually goes so far as to call into question Erhard Milch’s disastrous air force policies, as his blundering and/or lack of decisiveness caused the defeat at Normandy. The Germans could have easily annihilated the Allied forces, as they were ill-equipped, had no cover, fought like cowards, and had poor morale during the so-called “famous invasion.” There was opposition to the landing, as Hitler had accurately predicted that the Allies would indeed land on that particular piece of coast. The traitor, Wilhelm Canaris, ignored the Fuehrer and concentrated his units in the Pas de Calais region. When Hitler called for the backup bomber airplanes to assist his ground forces during that skirmish, none of them arrived. Nevertheless, the Wehrmacht put up a good fight.
During Operation Overlord, “Luftwaffe bombers, torpedo boats, submarines and mines sank six destroyers, a destroyer escort, and five frigates. An additional heavy cruiser, destroyer, frigate and corvette were permanently knocked out of commission” (p. 145). Remarkably, the first soldiers captured at Normandy were Russians who had been fighting for Hitler. The Americans were so disgusted by this that approximately 17,000 deserted during the renowned “Normandy Invasion” (Ibid.). In fact, in a 1974 Harper’s magazine article, it discussed how there were more American AWOLs than civilian strikers during the war, “more hours lost in desertion than lost because of strikes.” Many of the Army field-hospitals were riddled with American soldiers with self-inflicted wounds. Men were wounding themselves in order to “get away from the front” (pp. 145-146). During conscription under the Dutch Jewish President, F.D. Rosenfeld, American men were wetting their beds in order to avoid serving during WWII, as this had been grounds for dismissal (p. 109). But, so many American men were wetting their beds that Rosenfeld ultimately had to change the official grounds for conscript dismissal. Indeed, some 16,000 American men “didn't hear the call” and were arrested and incarcerated for draft-dodging during the Second World War (p. 110). So much for the accuracy of American history texts used in public Bolshevik schools, eh?
Americans Did Not want War Then and they Don’t Want War Now
A May 1941 Gallup poll indicates that about 79% of Americans did not want to get involved in the European conflict (p. 108). This is exactly what has happened with Iraq, and soon to come, Iran. If I could say anything to the Middle Eastern people it would be this: Our government does not listen to us. It has never listened to us.
George Washington, our first President, had warned all Americans not to let Jewry remain in America. The Americans ignored his warnings and we have been a Marxist-Communist nation ever since. The Yankees were the first batch of Communists to arrive in America. Europeans and AmerIndians lived peacefully together until the Bolsheviks arrived. They were the ones who committed genocide against the AmerIndians—for Jewish moneybags and raw capitalistic power. Capitalism is Communism—they are one entity. Democracy is just another name for Judeo-Bolshevism. So, even though the American people did not want war with Hitler, and do not want war with Iraq or Iran, the Jewish moneybags are the only ones who will decide whether or not we get involved. So, now you have a lot more of the truth at your disposal.
I for one know that these “insurgents” and so-called “terrorists” are just Jewish mercenaries and Mossad agents. I know that Jews pose as Hamas and Hezbollah fighters. I know this. Most Americans are not that smart though. They do not read. That’s the problem. So, it is up to the educated Moslems and Christians to unite and to educate others about the truth. A good rule of thumb is this: If Jews support it, don’t support it. If Jews like it, you should hate it. If Jews believe it, you shouldn’t believe it. Do everything opposite of Jewry. You can’t go wrong with that. They play the Left and Right; they play pro-war and anti-war; they play pro-Arab and anti-Arab. So, you have to know who is a Jew and who isn’t a Jew. That is the key. Look up their surnames and if they’re Jewish, boycott and ignore them.
The Tragic Case of the Failed Luftwaffe: Milch to Blame?
According to Schaerffenberg, in September 1943, Hitler asked Willy Messerschmidt if the new Sturmvogel could be outfitted as a bomber. Willy assured him that the plane could be swiftly transformed into a bomber “with no disruption in production” (p. 143). “Good,” Hitler said. “I order you to develop the 262 as a bomber, no longer as a fighter. We expect an invasion of France this spring. Just one squadron of these planes will be enough to pin down the Allies on the beaches long enough to bring up our ground forces.” Willy promised that one squadron, at minimum, of these bomber jet planes would be ready in time. Hitler left the Rechlin test-field that day to work out his D-Day strategy “based on the new aircraft, whose mass production as a bomber he left in the hands of Luftwaffe General Erhard Milch [Jew]. But, Professor Messerschmidt was aghast, as the plane had not been designed as a bomber. He had not even conceived of testing it as one, either. The bomb payloads added to the plane would severely inhibit its swift handling, “obviating its raison d’ete” (p. 143). Messerschmidt had to have known all this while he assured Hitler that it would be no problem at all to redesign the fighter as a bomber. Schaerffenberg asserts that Willy did it to secure for himself another lucrative Luftwaffe contract. The “womanizing Adolf Galland” and “Milch himself came to the manufacturer’s aid” (p. 144). Shaerffenberg asserts, “Together, the two combat pilots conspired behind their Fuehrer’s back to push through production of the 262 as a fighter, because they believed it was better used to re-establish the Luftwaffe’s air supremacy. They timidly suggested from time to time that the bomber version be dropped, but failed to grasp that it was important to hold the Anglo-American invaders at the beaches” (Ibid.).
“Effective immediately,” Hitler ordered, “I hereby refuse to discuss the ME.262 jet airplane in any other connection except as a fast or lightning bomber.” No one even told him that the plane needed to be re-engineered to carry bombs; had he known that this would be necessary, he undoubtedly would have given Messerschmidt all the time and resources he could have possibly needed (Ibid.). That was the problem. No one told Hitler that this plane wouldn’t be ready.
In May 1944, Hitler felt quite enthused about the imminent invasion and how it would be easily contained and rebuffed by these “Stormbird” bombers. That was the case until Milch “sheepishly” informed him that the jet planes had been “exclusively developed” as fighters. “Shocked into grim silence, Hitler stared out the window of his headquarters building without saying another word” (Ibid.). Even Jane’s had assessed that if the Stormbirds had been sent in as bombers at Normandy, the Allies would have easily been pinned down and held there without much ado. If the Fuehrer’s bomber version of the ME.262 had materialized, “D-Day might have turned out much more differently” (Ibid.).
Many historians paint Milch as a victim of Hitler’s meddling in jet aircraft development, but Milch was the man who sabotaged the Sturmvogel and cancelled the production of its only potential backup—Heinkel’s 219 (Ibid.). Indeed, just one of these twin-engine interceptors shot down eight British bombers in just seven minutes. It would have made an ideal emergency backup, since Milch proved himself to be a back-stabbing traitor against the Fuehrer by sabotaging the 262s. Instead, the wonderful Jewish General sabotaged the entire campaign by destroying two sets of jet aircraft that might have been used to rebuff the Allied advance at Normandy. That was the repayment Hitler received for trying to assist Jews and be lenient with them—treachery and sabotage. Do not forget that a massive Jewish/Soviet-run Communist underground, by the name of Red Orchestra, was operating full-tilt throughout Germany—before and during the war. Those were the Jews who were murdered by the few Einsatzgruppe units, and in the notorious Reinhard Camps. They were Communist murderers and traitors who were assisting a criminal regime—the Stalinist USSR. That Jewish subversion was detrimental to Hitler’s campaigns, as many of his own generals and adjutants were part of it. Canaris and Count Stauffenberg were both Soviet traitors. Canaris was the traitor who secured Ultra/Enigma for the Allies. Without Ultra, it is seriously questionable as to whether the Allies would have won the war. I believe they would have lost as early as 1940-1941 without the secrets of Ultra. Furthermore, Hitler never blundered during Barbarossa. Paulus and Guderian were the two bunglers of the Soviet campaign. Guderian was a hot-headed and ignorant fool who betrayed Hitler’s orders while he was ill in bed; indeed, he launched his own absurd campaign known as Operation Typhoon (Schaerff, pp. 100-101).
Paulus performed like an absolute coward in Stalingrad. Had it been Manstein, Model, or Rommel, the Wehrmacht would have remained intact and held the line, staving off both defeat and surrender. In fact, 100 Moslem-Semitic fighters proved to be braver and more valiant in the face of death than many German Wehrmacht soldiers. These 100 Moslems gave their lives in Berlin during the final Battle for Berlin. That is commendable.
Instead of a Hollowco$t memorial in Berlin, there ought to be a Moslem memorial for those 100 fallen Moslems in the heart of Berlin. The German taxpayers should fund it and discontinue blaming Moslems for their problems.
Part III: Final Comments by J.B. Campbell
I’m so glad that someone sent you this excerpt from my friend’s memoirs.
In 1994, I urged my dear friend, Heinz Weichardt of Pebble Beach, California, to make his experiences in Germany and America available to everyone. Heinz was half-Jewish and had taught me the realities of that side of his heritage along with the truth of National Socialist Germany. He was trained as a scientist and became a manager at IBM’s electron-optics division in this country. He was also a college professor in later years.
He did write his memoirs in the form of a letter to Louis Beam, a friend of mine and someone Heinz had always wanted to meet. Louis came out to see me in Carmel and we went over to Heinz' house. Louis agreed that he’d like to learn about Heinz’ life, so Heinz wrote the memoir and I edited it, putting it in more understandable English than his German syntax allowed.
The memoir was entitled, “Under Two Flags,” and was first printed by George Dietz’ Liberty Bell Magazine in 1994. It comprised the whole magazine and became the most popular issue of all. It had to be reprinted, so great was the demand for it. Heinz died soon after the second printing, but he was very gratified at the reception of his life story. In his first version, he'd neglected to tell the story that you reprinted today and I said that Americans really needed to know the truth about German gun control. Everyone is surprised to learn that the Nazis did not disarm the people, as we are constantly told ad nauseum, but in fact relaxed several gun laws that had been in effect before they came to power. And that Jews owned guns, just as everyone else did.
In 2000 a man in England called me and said he wanted to publish Heinz's story over there. I helped him with it and it was finally published under the sarcastic title, “Nazi Terror,” which is what your piece is called. I encourage everyone to get this 80-page book and learn the truth about the worst thing that ever happened to humanity—the Anglo-American Struggle to Save Communism (World War II).
References
Bamber, M., deZang, H.L., Muñoz, A. & Romanko, O. (2001). The East Came West: Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist Volunteers in the German Armed Forces 1941-1945. (Antonio Muñoz, Ed.). (Patrick Cloutier, Trans.). New York: Axis Europa Books.
Muñoz, A. & Romanko, O. (2003). Hitler’s White Russians: Collaboration, Extermination, and Anti-Partisan Warfare in Byelorussia, 1941-1945. New York: Europa Books.
Rigg, B.M. (2002). Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers: The Untold Story of Nazi Racial Laws and Men of Jewish Descent in the German Armed Forces. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Schaerffenberg, A.V. (2003). Hitler: Bungling Amateur or Military Genius? United States: Preuss.
Weichardt, H. (2004). Nazi Terror: A Short Autobiography of a Jewish National Socialist. Yorkshire: The Heretical Press.
|